Question: Why do people claim they have proof or “evidence” when they have none at all?
Has anyone ever noticed that when people say “The Earth is 6.3 billion years old” there is always a “probably” in between “6.3″ and “is”? How come no one ever points that when people say “Human-like creatures appeared years ago” they don’t remember that the sentence starts with “It is estimated that”?
It’s all theory.
Who are we as mere people to say what it is and what it isn’t? Nothing is certain so what’s the point of all this argument? How can we determine “fiction” from “non-fiction”. Who are we to say everything we know and believe is not the way the other person believes it to be? Maybe this is all a huge joke and Zeus or God or Odin or maybe all three are up there laughing at our “genius”? Then again maybe nothing’s out there but a cold vaccum or it could be whipped cream and chocolate noodles. I have no idea and neither does anyone else so why do we fight?
(Ugh… I need to go lie down)
Sorry sorry I got 6.3 billion from the Earth’s population. I’m 15 cut me some slack. Jeez…

Answer:

Answer by terje_treff
Sciencitic facts are not subject to opinion or belief. You either accept it or reject it. If you reject it, then you show that you do not understand science at all.

What you just wrote shows that you do not understand science, or what a scientific theory is. You’re better off if you learn this first before trying to make an argument against it.